Fearlessly Single


We all know people who are afraid to be single, but what about those fabulously fearless singles who don’t measure their success by their relationship status?

Fearlessly Single

Titov Studio / 123RF Photo

Stephanie Spielmann and six of her colleagues at the University of Toronto have just developed a “Fear of Being Single Scale” and then conducted a series of studies to see how it matters if you are fearful, vs. fearless, about living single. The title of their journal article says it all: “Settling for Less Out of Fear of Being Single.”

The “Fear of Being Single Scale” includes items such as these:

  • “I feel anxious when I think about being single forever.”
  • “It scares me to think there might not be anyone out there for me.”
  • “If I end up alone in life, I will probably feel that there is something wrong with me.”

In their article, the authors focus on people who are scared of single life. I’m going to flip the script, and zero in on the people who are unafraid of being single, and their great strengths and advantages over those who are running scared.

The first area of strength in fearless singles is personality. People who are unafraid of being single are more secure in all sorts of ways: They are less neurotic. They get their feelings hurt less often. They are less sensitive to rejection. They are less lonely and less depressed than the fearful ones, and a bit more open and extraverted. Their self-esteem does not depend on whether their romantic partner (if they have one) is being nice to them.

Some people who are unafraid of being single are undoubtedly single at heart and may not be interested in pursuing romantic relationships. So let’s look at the people who are unafraid of being single but are pursuing romantic relationships. Those people do so not because they are running away from single life, but because they think that a romantic relationship might add something of value to their lives.

Fearless singles have standards. When they are in an unsatisfying romantic relationship, they are more likely to break it off than are people who are afraid of being single. And in any of their romantic relationships, good or bad, they are less likely to feel needy and dependent when it comes to their partner (e.g., “If I couldn’t be in this relationship, I would lose an important part of myself”).

Show the unafraid online profiles of potential dating partners, and you will see how discriminating they are. They are mostly interested in people who seem caring and responsive and attractive. In contrast, people who are afraid of being single express almost as much interest in totally self-centered people and as in others.

At speed-dating events, in which participants took part in about 25 dates lasting 3 minutes each, the people who were afraid of being single wanted to give out their contact information to more of the potential partners than did the people who were unafraid of single life. Here they are settling once again.

The really interesting part about those who are fearful of being single and who settle in so many ways and seem to feel so badly about themselves – they were chosen by other potential partners in the speed dating events just as often as everyone else was! They might feel unworthy, but at least in the speed dating context, other people did not see them that way.

When the authors get to the end of their article, they note something very important – that their research is all about the fear of being single and “does not address the potential rewards of being single that may motivate people to be single.” Yes, that research is needed!

Oddly, though, in the paragraph before that, they made an observation that sounds uninformed about the whole range of interests and motivations that human beings have. Having reviewed all of the positive aspects of being unafraid of single life, the authors then wonder whether “taken to an extreme, little concern over being single could be associated with an unwillingness to accommodate or settle for anything but the highest standards in a way that leaves romantic or sexual needs unmet.” They add that maybe such single people are avoiding intimacy.

The authors seem to be assuming some universal need for romance; there is no such thing. They also seem to assume that everyone is interested in sex, and that the only way to get sex is to couple-up. They also seem to think that intimacy comes in only one flavor, when we single-at-heart types know that close and meaningful relationships can be had with friends and family and all sorts of relationship partners other than the ones you have sex with.

Aside from that one set of reservations, though, I like this work. It demonstrates something I have been preaching for years – if there were less singlism, then that would obviously be good for the single people who would no longer be stereotyped and stigmatized. Importantly, it would also be enormously beneficial for those people who are interested in coupling, because then they could pursue that interest from a position of strength rather than just running away from a life that they fear.

This article originally appeared in Bella DePaulo’s Single at Heart blog on PsychCentral.com and was edited for Singular magazine.

Bella DePauloSingularCity member Bella DePaulo (Ph.D., Harvard, 1979) is a single lifestyle expert and the author of several books, including “Singled Out: How Singles Are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After” and “How We Live Now: Redefining Home and Family in the 21st Century.” DePaulo has discussed singles and single life on radio and television, including NPR and CNN, and her work has been noted in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA TodayTime, Atlantic, Business Week and Newsweek. Visit her website at www.BellaDePaulo.com.
Leave a Comment on Facebook



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.